Total Number of Board Decisions (from 7/1/09-12/31/09):
43
Decisions by Statute:
MMBA: 21
EERA: 11
Dills Act: 8
HEERA: 3
Decisions by Type:
Appeals from Dismissals: 31 (11 of which were DFR’s)
Exceptions to ALJ Decisions: 7Approval of Settlement: 1
Administrative Appeal: 2
Reconsideration: 2
Decisions by Outcome:
Decisions affirmed: 39Decisions overturned: 2
- 1 ALJ decision overturned (2077-M)
- 1 dismissal overturned (2079-M)
Decisions partially overturned: 2
- Decisions 2069-H and 2070-H
Dowdin: 20
Neuwald: 9
McKeag: 7
Wesley: 7
Other Interesting Facts:
- 42 of the 43 decisions were unanimous. Only 1 decision drew a dissent: 2058-M by Member Neuwald
- The main thing that stands out to me is the affirmance rate, which was above 90%. That means a party's chances of getting a decision overturned was less than 10%. At that's only if you count the 2 partial dismissals.
- Also, with only 1 case drawing a dissent, this Board has been remarkably unanimous in its decisions.
- Finally, it's worth noting that oral argument remains the rarest of all Board actions. The last time the Board granted oral argument was in 2004 in a case involving the right of teachers to wear union buttons at work. (PERB Dec. No. 1727-E). The next most recent time (as far as I know) was in 1994 when the Board granted oral argument twice, one in a case involving CSU (PERB Dec. No. 1093-H) and one involving the University of California (PERB Dec. No. 1039-H). So only 3 times in the last 15 years and not once during the Schwarzenegger administration. I would enjoy watching another oral argument before the Board (I saw the one in 2004) so I'm hoping the Board grants a request in the next year.